Mark Driscoll trying to copyright the name Mars Hill?!

Early today my mate Simeon drew my attention to an article on “The Gates are Open” where the author reveals the plight of a friend of his, who’s church has received a “cease and desist” order from Mark Driscoll’s church over their church sharing the name “Mars Hill”.

I can understand his consternation. Could you imagine the flap if an Anglican church tried to copyright the name “St Paul’s”. There’d be an uproar! Here’s the most pertinent bits:

“Several weeks ago, Scott and his Sacramento congregation received a “Cease and Desist” letter which came from attorneys representing the Seattle Mars Hill Church. They were told that the Seattle Mars Hill had copyrighted the name “Mars Hill” and they demanded that the California Mars Hill churches stop using the name and any logos with similar lettering.”

“I was flabbergasted. First, I could not believe that a church would try and copyright the name of their church. I suppose if you wanted to make some money on the side, you could lease the name out to others. (My friend Ken thought it would be smart to copyright the name “First Baptist” and stick franchise stickers on the name and concept…I applaud his entrepreneurial spirit). But to outright disallow others from using a name that is found in the Bible because you want a monicker and label that only recognises YOU seems the very epitome of pride and arrogance.”

“Second, that a church would take legal action to require other churches to comply violates both the letter and the spirit of the Word of God. The Bible is explicit when we are told not to take other believers to court when the issues regard spiritual matters. The naming of a church is certainly a spiritual matter and it is hard to see how someone could theologically skirt around this.”

What’s your view? Is this corporatization gone mad?

3 thoughts on “Mark Driscoll trying to copyright the name Mars Hill?!

  1. Having compared the logos at Mars Hill Sacramento (, Mars Hill Seattle ( and Mars Hill Michigan ( I would offer the following observations. There are some superficial similarities between the Sacramento and Seattle logos, on account of them both featuring an ‘M’ and a black and white colour scheme. However, that being said, I reckon they’re sufficently different that they can easily be told apart and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see why they would both include an ‘M’ in their logo.
    By way of comparison, take a look at the logos of Coles ( and Arthur Anderson ( Both had orange balls. Nothing to get too excited about.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s