Curious Christian

Reflections on culture, nature, and spirituality from a Christian perspective

This evening, a friend called me to say that “The Secret” was being discussed on Oprah, so I tuned in and watched the episode.

“The Secret”—what a curious title. As Puppetji humorously pointed out, “Everybody’s talking about The Secret, so I guess it’s not much of a secret anymore.” I couldn’t agree more.

The idea that this is something new or hidden feels misleading. Many of the featured speakers are authors I remember from the New Age Movement of the 1990s. The documentary itself, produced by Rhonda Byrne, openly acknowledges that much of its content is based on “The Science of Getting Rich” by Wallace D. Wattles, a New Thought author from 1910. So, was the so-called “law of attraction” ever really a secret?

The entire concept feels like a rehash of ideas we’ve seen before: mind power, human potential, and the promise of self-transformation. It’s simply been repackaged to appeal to a modern audience—perhaps inspired by the mystical allure of something like The Da Vinci Code.

For Christians, it might be helpful to explore the parallels between this and prosperity theology. The emphasis on manifesting wealth and success through positive thinking bears striking similarities to the idea that faith and belief can lead to material blessings. Reflecting on those connections could be a meaningful exercise, especially when evaluating the balance between spiritual and material pursuits.

In the end, what’s being presented here is less a “secret” and more of a reminder of well-worn principles that have been circulating for over a century.

4 responses to “The Secret: Old Ideas In New Packaging”

  1. kay Avatar

    “A useful exercise for Christians would be to reflect on the connections between this and prosperity theology.”
    I had that same thought and mentioned it in my “RANT” about the secret on my blog.

    Like

  2. Andy Avatar

    i saw the chaser rip into the secret last night…. was a crack up…
    but they summed up the teaching as 1.Ask 2.believe 3.receive
    now i have sat through many Hillsong messages in my time and i can guarantee i have hear the EXACT formula being preached…. but instead of asking the “universe” we ask God… our cosmic vending machine…

    Like

  3. Matt Stone Avatar

    Yes, well, I think you should have spelled “universe” with a capital U. For pantheists the difference between “God” and the “Universe” can get rather blurry. 🙂
    And when the mind powers gurus do start using the “God” word, as they did on Oprah, this can get very confusing and seductive for sheltered Christians who have not previously engaged with religious pluralism and have no idea about “God” language beyond the church. No wonder some have got it all mixed up.

    Like

  4. Matt Stone Avatar

    Kay, yes, like yourself I am quite critical of the whole “blame the victim” approach.
    In Christian theology, the whole question of why people have problems or fail to reach their full potential is attributed to a multitude of causes. Yes, personal responsibility comes into it, but so does the responsibility of the body politic and opposition by external powers. Not only that, in Jesus we have the example of a hero who suffered, not because he failed to reach his full potential, but as a way of manifesting his full potential, as a way of helping and healing others through refusing to bow to the powers of death! So much more sophisticated and holistic than this shallow ego-centricism.

    Like

Leave a comment