Curious Christian

Reflections on culture, nature, and spirituality from a Christian perspective

Emerging Taxonomy Debates

What is emerging church? Is it always missional? Or is it something else? Is involvement in alternative worship a defining mark? Or not? Or is it all of the above?

What does emerging church encompas? What does it mean?

Fernando Gros has helpfully summarised some of the recent buzz and I recommend you also check out (e)mergent Voyageur's reflections on Redemptive Taxonomy In The Emerging/Missional Divide.

Here are some comments I made in an email conversation the other day to someone who discribes himself as an interested observer of the Emerging Church. This was all off the cuff but is fairly representative of my thoughts on the taxonomy issues:


To tell you the truth I see the ‘emerging church’ label as more of a conversation starter than a last word. I’m yet to hear a definition everyone agrees on. At times it means little more than, hey we’re trying to follow Christ in ways that don’t fit the conventional definitions. But all that does is tell people what EC isn’t, not what EC is. It’s an apophatic ecclesiology in a way.


See, why I say this is that most of what I do is outside the church too, at least in terms of how church is conventionally understood. I have a loose network of mission-minded companions who I share the journey with as well as a loose relationship to a more conventional, if somewhat informal, church. We don’t worship together often at all but they’re a lifeline in terms of companionship and support. Most of all I see us somewhat in the mode of William Carey’s to the west, mission-minded Christians incarnating into the new globalised subcultures so that the people within them might know the love of Christ in their own terms. Being a companion on a quest doesn’t require us to live in each others pockets, it just requires us to share a commitment to a cause and one another. Think ‘Fellowship of the Ring’ with how the companions scattered and came together at different stages in the quest.


Sure, some ECer’s get really into close knit alternate worship services, but to be honest I don’t think they are not always the most missional experiments around as I see them attracting burnt out Christans a lot more than non-Christians. So don’t think that just because you’re not connected with an alt. worship group that you can’t be involved. Not all of us are either! Then again, not all would call themselves ECers either. Some would prefer to be called church exiles, some just missional Christians. We don’t care.

 

3 responses to “Emerging Taxonomy Debates”

  1. sally Avatar

    “Sure, some ECer’s get really into close knit alternate worship services, but to be honest I don’t think they are not always the most missional experiments around as I see them attracting burnt out Christans a lot more than non-Christians. So don’t think that just because you’re not connected with an alt. worship group that you can’t be involved. Not all of us are either! Then again, not all would call themselves ECers either. Some would prefer to be called church exiles, some just missional Christians. We don’t care.”
    amen and amen to your comment Matt

    Like

  2. Steve Hayes Avatar

    Wow, I only recently learned that there was an “emerging church” (as opposed to the Church emerging from wherever it has been hiding), and now I discover that there is an “Emerging/Missional” divide!

    Like

  3. Matt Stone Avatar

    Well I wouldn’t want to over emphasise the ‘divide’ as there is a hell of a degree of crossover but there’s just a little frustrating emerging amongst some of us with overly simplistic takes on the whole phenomenon.
    Some EC voices seem to think that just because they’re creative that there contextual. No, by itself that just makes them creative. Using the language of contextualisation without actually listening to the non post-evangelicals in your context only muddies the waters. But the opposite can also be true, you don’t have to be an artist to be post-modern.
    By the same token, there needs to be recognition that there’s lots of people doing cutting edge missional experiments within post-modernity who are distancing themselves from the ’emerging church’ identity because others are defining it too narrowly. Yet what they are doing should be legitimately acknowledged. They should be defined out of the conversation so casually.
    The complexity of what’s ’emerging’ needs to be acknowledged.

    Like

Leave a reply to Matt Stone Cancel reply