This is just a question I want to throw out there. How much of the emerging / missional conversation is just “white people yakking”?
Over the years I have witnessed a number of people raise concerns about the disparity in female participation in the emerging church. Now, that’s not hard to notice, it’s pretty easy to discern just from the names of people. Yes, yes, some names are ambiguous. I must sheepishly confess that I wondered whether Dan and Phil McCredden were a homosexual couple the first time I came across their blog at Signposts. But discerning ethnic disparities of participants just from their names and writing style is a much riskier prospect indeed. Some are obvious. I think it’s a pretty safe bet that anyone named Moses will be African, and anyone named Jesus will be South American, and anyone named Singh will be Sikh, but beyond that, who knows?
With the advent of Facebook however a clearer picture is emerging and I can see my own “friends” list seems very shaded towards the white end of the spectrum indeed. Out of my hundred and fifty plus contacts, I can now see only two are Asian and only one is Afro-American. Yikes! I don’t know about you but I find that disturbing. My real life situation is far more diverse. So I have some questions. For those of you who are also on Facebook, how are your contacts lists looking? For those of you who are bloggers, do you know much about the ethnic diversity of your readers? For those of you who are visitors, where do you fit in with this picture? For all of you, how many blogs do you visit regularly of people who share a different ethnicity from your own?







Leave a reply to Steve Hayes Cancel reply