One of the things I like about the Christian counseling course I am presently working through is the way it brings both theology and psychology together in both a practical and theoretical way. The course is specifically aimed at helping us develop practical experience and a working theology in concert with one another, an approach that gels very well with own my holistic orientation.
This weekend I was studying my class notes on Dr Henry Cloud in preparation for my upcoming exam, and one of the key issues Cloud raises is the way both grace and truth apply work in the counseling process. I particularly remember one comment, that both grace and truth are necessary for true intimacy. Without grace, truth only brings experience of judgment and shame. But without truth, there is no meeting of the true self.
I have long held that legalism (truth without grace) and license (grace without truth) are equal and opposite errors, and have been critical of those who regard the first as the lesser evil, but this comment about finding true intimacy really struck home. Separating truth from grace and grace from truth is not just a theological error; it is also a practical error of the most serious kind. In a sense, we cannot find true love unless there is truth in love. This takes me back to the beginning of the gospel of John: “For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.” Simple words, profound impact.
- Have you experienced loveless truth?
- Have you experienced truth-blind love?
- Have you experienced the qualitative difference?






Leave a comment