Curious Christian

Reflections on culture, nature, and spirituality from a Christian perspective

John Piper has sparked significant conversation this week with his assertion that God intentionally gave Christianity a “masculine feel.” He made these comments during the Desiring God conference, framing the faith’s identity as predominantly shaped by male attributes and leadership. While Piper’s views have garnered attention, they’ve also provoked a wave of critical responses from various voices in the Christian community, including Rachel Held Evans, Christian Piatt, and Kristina Robb-Dover. (A nod to Rod Benson for curating these perspectives.)

But Piper’s bold claim invites a deeper question: How did the prophets and early biblical figures really understand God? Was their understanding as unflinchingly masculine as Piper suggests, or is there more nuance to be found in scripture?

I say, let’s turn to the Bible itself for answers. Consider the words of Moses in Numbers 11:12: “Did I conceive all these people? Did I give them birth? Why do you tell me to carry them in my arms, as a nurse carries an infant, to the land you promised on oath to their ancestors?” Here, Moses uses maternal imagery, likening his role to that of a mother or nurse caring for a child. This verse directly challenges the idea that God—or leadership under God—can only be understood in masculine terms.

Furthermore, scripture is filled with examples of women, like the prophetess Deborah, stepping into powerful roles and embodying divine leadership. Deborah, in particular, is a striking example of a woman chosen by God to lead Israel, both in judgment and in battle. I imagine her sharpening tent pegs right now, ready to challenge any notion that God’s authority is reserved only for men.

In light of this, it seems reductive to box God into a solely masculine framework. Instead, the Bible provides rich imagery of God that transcends gendered categories, offering a more complex and holistic view of the divine.

9 responses to “Does God favours testicles over ovaries?”

  1. Matt Stone Avatar

    Some great reflections there Tamie. The first one was particularly enlightening and thought provoking.

    Like

  2. Matt Stone Avatar

    Stackhouse offers an interesting reflection as well:
    “…it is a logical mistake to say that God’s depicting Godself in masculine terms entails that the religion of Christianity ought to be masculine. For Christianity is not God, but is the way we human beings live in response to God. So if God is masculine in this picture, then the way we ought to respond to God would be (as C. S. Lewis notoriously suggested) feminine. And both Testaments image the people of God in those terms: bride of Yhwh, bride of Christ.”
    http://stackblog.wordpress.com/2012/02/09/stop-the-presses-john-piper-thinks-christianity-is-masculine/

    Like

  3. Jarred Avatar

    I thought I’d share a bit of humor as suggested by one of my favorite bloggers:
    (P.S. Piper wants the church to have more of a “masculine feel.” The Bible says that the church is “the bride of Christ.” Can we conclude, then, that Piper has reversed his opposition to same-sex marriage?)

    Like

  4. Rodger Cunningham Avatar

    “Hath the rain a father? Or who hath begotten the drops of dew? Out of whose womb came the ice? Or the hoary frost of heaven, who hath gendered it?” Job 38:28-29.

    Like

  5. Lucy J Avatar
    Lucy J

    Good one, Jarred, ROFL!
    A few things come to mind…the current “pay out the Piper” conversations provide opportunity to wrestle with some really basic issues affecting our world today… sex and violence. Unresolved issues, lack of harmony/wholeness deep within an individua’s being affect the way one thinks and acts, and can have enormous outcomes if the person’s influence is far-reaching . Both biological sex (nature) and gender socialisation (nurture) shape the person. There is more of a variety of lifestyle and views in public discussion these days than for many centuries. However, there doesn’t seem to be any less violence in our societies… self-harm, suicide, domestic violence, racial violence, national violence, international violence – statistical evidence points to the rising tide.
    “For Christianity is not God, but is the way we human beings live in response to God”. Very true.
    Our response is flawed, idolatrous, and too often, results in oppression of the weak and degeneration into violence – the very issues the OT prophets addressed (and genuine contemporary ones, too).
    Extrapolate flawed theology and reap violence to some degree. Jesus’ life and teachings go to the heart of the matters… looks at the relationship between hate and murder, for example. As I wrote elsewhere,
    ultimately, the whole idea of “gendering” or “biologically sexualising or neutering” God smacks of power play which human beings seem to perfect, and then either project or transfer onto God their own delusions/illusions, depending on whether we are comfortable or uncomfortable with ourselves and/or others. Historically, females (women) have fared worse in the sexualisation/gender “wars” than males (men).
    BTW, Matt, are you insinuating that Deborah supplied Jael the murder weapon, LOL? That song of Deborah is pretty confronting, exemplifying that overall, the time of the Book of Judges in the OT was a very violent era with too many people doing “what was right in their own eyes”.
    Perhaps the Piper discussions are helping us all to journey further on the pathway to enlightenment about some important issues… and I do firmly believe that the Light of the World is Jesus and that The Way is the ultimate path to healing, wholeness, and that our participation in it will lead us to peace both within one’s being and in the world beyond our own skin, whomsoever and howsoever, we are. Shalom!

    Like

  6. Matt Stone Avatar

    @Jarred. Awesome!

    Like

  7. Matt Stone Avatar

    @Lucy,
    No, I wasn’t suggesting Deborah and Jael were in direct cahoots. Nor, given our post-resurrection perspective, am I celebrating their actions. I merely thought it apt to reference some of the “strong women” of the Bible in the face of Piper’s supposedly “Biblical” gender polarizations. Neither Deborah nor Jael were wilting flowers. Indeed, the closest modern parallel I can think of to Jael is Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Where, I ask, does (1) a prophetess who led Israel and commanded ten thousand warriors and (2) a XX chromosome bearing general-slayer who liberated Israel from its oppressor fit into Piper’s understanding of God and Godly sexuality? His theology seems to have a lot of loose threads.

    Like

  8. Lucy J Avatar
    Lucy J

    NO, Matt, not Buffy! Definitely Evelyn Salt! A man’s job to save the world can’t be done without her… but, truly, I don’t condone violence. Just standing strong in intercession when I am required and enabled to do so…

    Like

Leave a reply to Lucy J Cancel reply