Curious Christian

Reflections on culture, nature, and spirituality from a Christian perspective

I find it fascinating that the more and more we discover about planets, the more and more special ours looks. Here’s the latest from New Scientist:

THE discovery of extrasolar super-Earths – rocky planets about five to ten times the mass of Earth – has raised hopes that some may harbour life. Perhaps it’s a vain hope though, since it now seems that Earth is just the right size to sustain life.

Life is comfortable on Earth in part because of its relatively stable climate and its magnetic field, which deflects cosmic radiation capable of damaging organic molecules as well as producing amazing auroras (see right).

The long-term stability of Earth’s climate depends on the way the planet’s crust is broken up into plates, which continually slide over and under one another in a process called plate tectonics. Carbon scrubbed from the atmosphere by natural chemical reactions gets buried and recycled within the Earth because of plate tectonics, part of a cycle that stabilises atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations.

Now it seems rocky worlds have to be about the size of Earth to have both plate tectonics and magnetic fields, says Vlada Stamenkovic of the German Aerospace Center in Berlin. His team will present the work at the European Planetary Science Congress in Potsdam, Germany, on 15 September.

Heat from Earth’s core creates the convection currents needed for plate tectonics. Such currents generate the force to tear the crust, produce multiple plates and move those plates around.

Stamenkovic’s team found that the pressure and viscosity inside a super-Earth would be so high that a stagnant, insulating layer would form outside the core, weakening the convective currents needed to drive plate tectonics thus making the process unlikely. A 2007 study that concluded super-Earths were prone to plate tectonics did not account for the increase in viscosity that produces the stagnant layer (New Scientist, 13 October 2007, p 20).

The researchers also found that the slow transfer of heat out of the core in super-Earths would prevent a sufficiently rapid circulation of their molten cores, robbing them of a magnetic field.

Planets about 0.5 to 2.5 times the mass of Earth are most likely to support plate tectonics. The limits are fuzzier for magnetic field generation, but also favour Earth-sized planets. “Earth is special,” says Stamenkovic.

But astrobiologist David Grinspoon of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science in Colorado points out that Venus seems to have recycled its crust in volcanic outbursts despite a lack of plate tectonics. While this has not stabilised Venus’s climate, he says, the possibility that other forms of crustal recycling on super-Earths might do so should not be ruled out. “There may be super-Earths that have intelligent life that has concluded that no life is possible on puny planets such as ours,” says Grinspoon.

Whether you attribute this to the anthropic principle or something else, the implications for Fermi’s paradox are obvious. We are rarer than we thought.

2 responses to “Earth-sized planets are just right for life”

  1. Janet Avatar

    “The Case for a Creator” by Strobel is a refreshingly readable book for non-science people. It outlines the vast improbabilities of anything being (including matter as we know it)… and the vast improbability of the simplest cell forming by chance. The probability of this happening is smaller than the number of atoms in the universe to one.
    Delve into this, and you wouldn’t expect the universe to be teeming with life. The amazing thing is that it’s happened at all.
    Not that I mind if there’s life elsewhere… I just think having lots of planets in the universe doesn’t really tell you anything about the absurdly improbably event called life.

    Like

  2. Matt Stone Avatar

    Ah, I am a science person so I go straight to the science magazines and journals. I am actually quite open to the idea of life spontaneously generating. Civilized life though, I have to ask, why don’t we see it? Fermi’s paradox gets me thinking.
    I’ve always thought the uniqueness of our moon deserves close attention, as well as what scientists have discovered regarding the galactic habitable zone. It dashes many a SciFi dream. See:
    http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/G/galactic_habitable_zone.html
    It suggests that environmental stability is crucially important for life.
    We live on a remarkably stable planet in a remarkably stable solar system in a remarkably stable region of the galaxy, which in turn happens to be a remarkably stable galaxy. We are standing on a remakable world.
    Now we humans are doing our best to destabilize it.

    Like

Leave a reply to Matt Stone Cancel reply